Trajectory Daily Brief: 25 January 2026
Pentagon tells allies to defend themselves as Britain abandons the Gulf after 46 years. China studies Venezuela's survival playbook while keeping warships out of America's backyard.
🎧 Listen to this article
Global | Defence | Pentagon’s 2025 strategy shifts defense burden to allies facing nuclear-armed adversaries
Situation
The Pentagon’s 2025 defense strategy explicitly directs allied nations to assume greater responsibility for their own security rather than relying on extended US deterrence guarantees.
Japan, South Korea, and Poland find themselves particularly exposed under this new framework. All three face direct threats from nuclear-armed neighbors—China and North Korea for the Asian allies, Russia for Poland.
The strategic shift comes as existing diplomatic mechanisms appear inadequate to address the speed and scale of emerging threats in their respective regions.
Context
This represents a fundamental departure from seven decades of US security architecture that kept proliferation in check through extended deterrence. The US nuclear umbrella previously made independent nuclear programs unnecessary for these allies.
Historical precedent suggests nations facing existential threats develop nuclear capabilities when superpower protection becomes unreliable. Israel, India, and Pakistan all pursued nuclear weapons when traditional security guarantees proved insufficient.
The timing is critical. All three countries possess advanced civilian nuclear infrastructure and technical expertise, significantly reducing the timeline for weapons development compared to historical cases.
Trajectory
These allies now face a stark calculation: accept vulnerability or pursue independent deterrence. Traditional diplomatic solutions operate on timescales that may not match the immediacy of their security dilemmas.
Japan’s pacifist constitution and South Korea’s NPT commitments create political hurdles, but existential threats have historically overridden such constraints. Poland faces fewer legal obstacles.
The Pentagon’s strategy may inadvertently accelerate the very proliferation it seeks to contain, as rational actors fill the security vacuum left by reduced US commitments.
Middle East | Defence | Britain ends 46-year Gulf naval presence as Iran threat escalates
Situation
The Royal Navy has withdrawn its last warship from Bahrain, ending 46 years of continuous naval presence in the Gulf. The departure comes amid heightened tensions with Iran and ongoing regional instability.
Britain maintained a permanent naval task force in Gulf waters since 1978, operating from facilities in Bahrain. The withdrawal represents a complete end to the UK’s sustained military presence in the strategically vital waterway.
Context
The timing exposes a fundamental split among US allies between those treating security commitments as discretionary spending versus existential requirements. While Britain retreats, Gulf states and Israel continue expanding military capabilities despite economic pressures.
This mirrors broader alliance dynamics where traditional partners reduce overseas commitments while regional allies increase defense investments. The Gulf has seen similar patterns with other European allies scaling back presence even as threats intensify.
Britain’s departure also reflects post-Brexit budget constraints and strategic reorientation toward the Indo-Pacific, leaving America’s regional security architecture increasingly dependent on local partners rather than traditional European allies.
Trajectory
The withdrawal signals accelerating role reversal in alliance burden-sharing, with regional allies assuming greater responsibility as traditional partners retreat. This trend will likely intensify as European allies prioritize domestic concerns over distant commitments.
America faces growing pressure to either fill gaps left by departing allies or accept reduced Western influence in key regions. The Gulf withdrawal may preview similar European pullbacks from other strategic theaters, forcing fundamental reassessment of alliance structures.
Indo-Pacific | Taiwan | China views Venezuela’s regime survival under sanctions as validation of isolation strategy
Situation
China’s military preparations for potential Taiwan action by 2027 continue despite Venezuela’s economic collapse serving as an apparent cautionary tale about authoritarian isolation. Venezuela’s economy contracted 88% between 2013-2020, triggering 7.7 million refugees and hyperinflation above 130,000%.
Yet Beijing draws the opposite lesson Western strategists expected. Rather than seeing Venezuela as proof that sanctions and isolation destroy regimes, Chinese analysts focus on the Maduro government’s political survival after nearly a decade of comprehensive Western sanctions.
The Pentagon’s 2025 China military report identifies three strategic capabilities under development: decisive victory over Taiwan, countering US intervention, and deterring additional conflict fronts.
Context
Beijing’s reading of Venezuela centers on regime durability, not economic performance. Despite maximum Western pressure since 2017, Maduro remains in power with functioning security apparatus and loyal inner circle—surviving longer than many democratic governments last through electoral cycles.
China provided over $60 billion in oil-backed loans and became Venezuela’s primary oil purchaser, demonstrating that Western isolation need not mean global isolation. Research from the German Institute for Global and Area Studies shows sanctions often strengthen rather than weaken authoritarian regimes by enabling blame-shifting and justifying repression.
Mass emigration of 7.7 million Venezuelans removed the regime’s most capable potential opponents while importing stabilizing remittances. For Xi Jinping, whose legitimacy rests on reversing China’s “century of humiliation,” external pressure would provide similar rally-around-the-flag benefits.
Trajectory
China has spent two decades building Venezuela-style alternative networks: CIPS payment systems bypassing SWIFT, Belt and Road infrastructure creating dependencies across 140 countries, and substantial progress in semiconductor self-sufficiency for military applications.
These alternatives need not match Western efficiency—only function well enough to sustain China under maximum pressure long enough to achieve Taiwan objectives. Venezuela survived comprehensive sanctions with far fewer resources.
The Communist Party’s legitimacy increasingly depends on territorial completion. Taiwan represents unfinished business from China’s civil war and colonial humiliation, making economic costs secondary to political imperatives driving the 2027 timeline.
Pacific | Naval Strategy | Chinese Western Hemisphere presence remains largely commercial despite US concerns over fleet diversion
Situation
China operates no documented naval combat presence in the Western Hemisphere during 2020-2024, according to open-source analysis. Activities consist primarily of humanitarian missions like the Ark Silk Road hospital ship and routine port calls to Brazil in 2024.
Chinese investment focuses on commercial infrastructure, notably the Chancay megaport in Peru and port management systems across South America. US Southern Command tracks this expansion while cataloguing Chinese-manufactured cranes at ports from Buenos Aires to Long Beach.
The US Navy maintains Pacific Fleet operations unchanged, with carriers Abraham Lincoln and Carl Vinson patrolling South China Sea and Philippine Sea respectively in December 2024, despite ongoing Chinese commercial expansion in Latin America.
Context
Pentagon planners debate whether phantom Chinese naval presence forces Pacific asset diversion, potentially weakening deterrence where it matters most. This reflects American strategic culture more than Chinese capability—SOUTHCOM must justify budgets by identifying regional threats while INDOPACOM guards resources.
The real constraint isn’t Chinese activity in Latin America but US shipyard capacity, crew retention, and industrial production limits. Navy struggles to maintain existing 295-ship fleet regardless of deployment patterns.
Chinese infrastructure creates dual-use potential rather than immediate military threat. Ports could theoretically support naval operations during Taiwan crisis, while management systems enable intelligence collection. However, no evidence suggests conversion of commercial facilities to military use or host nation consent for such activities.
Trajectory
The allocation fallacy—treating naval deployment like household budgets—misunderstands Dynamic Force Employment capabilities that enable unpredictable surging without static global presence.
Real vulnerability lies in information infrastructure rather than fleet diversion. Chinese port systems and telecommunications create espionage opportunities requiring industrial policy responses, not naval redeployment.
Strategic focus should remain on Pacific deterrence where $10 billion Pacific Deterrence Initiative funding addresses actual pacing challenge, rather than shadowing hospital ships that serve institutional rather than operational imperatives.
Yesterday’s Assessments
- Trump’s alliance doctrine pushes japan, south Korea, and poland toward nuclear weapons faster than treaties can stop them
- Will Trump’s security doctrine push Japan, South Korea, and Poland toward nuclear weapons?
Until tomorrow.
